Melbourne Office - PO Box 452, COLLINS STREET WEST VIC 8007 AUSTRALIA
Sydney Office - GPO Box 2506, SYDNEY NSW 2001 AUSTRALIA
Telephone: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3709 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 2600
Facsimile: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3217 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 3044
Email:adr@arbitrator.com.au Internet:http://www.arbitrator.com.au

User Tools

Site Tools


enforcement_of_an_domestic_arbitration_award

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
enforcement_of_an_domestic_arbitration_award [2016/03/09 15:55]
steve [2015]
enforcement_of_an_domestic_arbitration_award [2017/07/30 18:00] (current)
Line 9: Line 9:
   * [[Larkden v Lloyd Energy Systems|April 1, 2011 - Larkden Pty Limited -v- Lloyd Energy Systems Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 268]]   * [[Larkden v Lloyd Energy Systems|April 1, 2011 - Larkden Pty Limited -v- Lloyd Energy Systems Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 268]]
 Please note that our [[are_there_any_reported_decisions_of_your_mr_white|Mr White]] was the arbitrator in that dispute. ​ Please note that our [[are_there_any_reported_decisions_of_your_mr_white|Mr White]] was the arbitrator in that dispute. ​
-====== Legislation ​======+===== Legislation =====
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​|Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 (NSW)]]   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​|Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 (NSW)]]
     * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s16.html|s16 Competence of arbitral tribunal to rule on its jurisdiction]]     * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s16.html|s16 Competence of arbitral tribunal to rule on its jurisdiction]]
Line 17: Line 17:
     * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s36.html|s36 Grounds for refusing recognition or enforcement]]     * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s36.html|s36 Grounds for refusing recognition or enforcement]]
   * [[http://​www.nzlii.org/​nz/​legis/​consol_act/​aa1996137/​|Arbitration Act 1996]] (NZ), Second Schedule, s5(1)%%(c%%) ​   * [[http://​www.nzlii.org/​nz/​legis/​consol_act/​aa1996137/​|Arbitration Act 1996]] (NZ), Second Schedule, s5(1)%%(c%%) ​
-====== Cases ====== +===== Cases ===== 
-===== 2015 =====+===== 2017 ===== 
 +  * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​vic/​VSC/​2017/​97.html|Blanalko Pty Ltd v Lysaght Building Solutions Pty Ltd]](([2017] VSC 97)) 
 +==== 2016 ==== 
 +  * [[Amasya Enterprises v Asta Developments|Amasya Enterprises Pty Ltd v Asta Developments (Aust) Pty Ltd]] (([2016] VSC 326)) 
 +==== 2015 ====
   * [[Cameron Australasia v AED Oil|Cameron Australasia Pty Ltd v AED Oil Ltd]] (([2015] VSC 163))   * [[Cameron Australasia v AED Oil|Cameron Australasia Pty Ltd v AED Oil Ltd]] (([2015] VSC 163))
   * [[Colin Joss & Co v Cube Furniture|Colin Joss & Co Pty Ltd v Cube Furniture Pty Ltd]] (([2015] NSWSC 735))   * [[Colin Joss & Co v Cube Furniture|Colin Joss & Co Pty Ltd v Cube Furniture Pty Ltd]] (([2015] NSWSC 735))
   * [[Novawest Contracting v Brimbank City Council]] (([2015] VSC 679))   * [[Novawest Contracting v Brimbank City Council]] (([2015] VSC 679))
-===== 2014 =====+==== 2014 ====
   * [[Re 700 Form Holdings Pty Ltd]] (([2014] VSC 385))   * [[Re 700 Form Holdings Pty Ltd]] (([2014] VSC 385))
   * [[Seagate Technology LLC v Western Digital Corporation|Seagate Technology LLC v Western Digital Corporation,​ et al]] ((No. A12-1994))   * [[Seagate Technology LLC v Western Digital Corporation|Seagate Technology LLC v Western Digital Corporation,​ et al]] ((No. A12-1994))
-===== 2013 =====+==== 2013 ====
   * [[Limin James Chen v Kevin McNamara & Son|Limin James Chen & Anor v Kevin McNamara & Son Pty Ltd & Anor]] (([2013] VSC 539))   * [[Limin James Chen v Kevin McNamara & Son|Limin James Chen & Anor v Kevin McNamara & Son Pty Ltd & Anor]] (([2013] VSC 539))
   * [[MRI Trading v Erdenet Mining|MRI Trading AG v Erdenet Mining Corporation LLC]] (([2013] EWCA Civ 156))   * [[MRI Trading v Erdenet Mining|MRI Trading AG v Erdenet Mining Corporation LLC]] (([2013] EWCA Civ 156))
-===== 2012 =====+  * [[Ringwood Agricultural Company Pty Ltd v Grain Link (NSW) Pty Limited]](([2013] NSWSC 191)) 
 +==== 2012 ====
   * [[Doohan v North Shore Transport|Doohan v North Shore Transport Pty Ltd]] (([2012] NSWWCCPD 42))   * [[Doohan v North Shore Transport|Doohan v North Shore Transport Pty Ltd]] (([2012] NSWWCCPD 42))
   * [[Sugar Australia v Mackay Sugar|Sugar Australia Pty Limited v Mackay Sugar Ltd]](([2012] QSC 38))   * [[Sugar Australia v Mackay Sugar|Sugar Australia Pty Limited v Mackay Sugar Ltd]](([2012] QSC 38))
Line 38: Line 43:
   * [[Ashjal v Alfred Toepfer International Australia|Ashjal Pty Ltd v Alfred Toepfer International (Australia) Pty Ltd]](([2012] NSWSC 1306))   * [[Ashjal v Alfred Toepfer International Australia|Ashjal Pty Ltd v Alfred Toepfer International (Australia) Pty Ltd]](([2012] NSWSC 1306))
     * The enactment of [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s5.html|s5]],​ [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s34.html|s34]],​ [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s35.html|s35]] and [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s36.html|s36]] of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 was not beyond the legislative power of the New South Wales Parliament     * The enactment of [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s5.html|s5]],​ [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s34.html|s34]],​ [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s35.html|s35]] and [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​nsw/​consol_act/​caa2010219/​s36.html|s36]] of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 was not beyond the legislative power of the New South Wales Parliament
-===== 2011 =====+==== 2011 ====
   * [[Larkden v Lloyd Energy Systems|December 2011, 16 - Larkden Pty Limited -v- Lloyd Energy Systems Pty Limited]](([2011] NSWSC 1567))   * [[Larkden v Lloyd Energy Systems|December 2011, 16 - Larkden Pty Limited -v- Lloyd Energy Systems Pty Limited]](([2011] NSWSC 1567))
     * Our [[are_there_any_reported_decisions_of_your_mr_white|Mr White]] was the arbitrator in this matter.     * Our [[are_there_any_reported_decisions_of_your_mr_white|Mr White]] was the arbitrator in this matter.
Line 59: Line 64:
     * His Honour refused the application for leave to appeal and granted the respondents leave to enforce the final award.     * His Honour refused the application for leave to appeal and granted the respondents leave to enforce the final award.
     * There is no basis for an order granting the applicants an extension of time within which to appeal against Hargrave J’s decision. I would refuse the application.     * There is no basis for an order granting the applicants an extension of time within which to appeal against Hargrave J’s decision. I would refuse the application.
-===== 2010 =====+==== 2010 ====
   * [[Cargill International v Peabody Australia Mining|Cargill International SA v Peabody Australia Mining Ltd]](([2010] NSWSC 887))    * [[Cargill International v Peabody Australia Mining|Cargill International SA v Peabody Australia Mining Ltd]](([2010] NSWSC 887)) 
   * [[Leveraged Equities v Huxley|Leveraged Equities Pty Ltd v Huxley]] (([2010] NSWCA 179))   * [[Leveraged Equities v Huxley|Leveraged Equities Pty Ltd v Huxley]] (([2010] NSWCA 179))
Line 67: Line 72:
   * [[Telstraclear v Kordia|Telstraclear Ltd v Kordia Ltd]]((AK CIV-2010-404-1168 28 September 2010))   * [[Telstraclear v Kordia|Telstraclear Ltd v Kordia Ltd]]((AK CIV-2010-404-1168 28 September 2010))
     * This case looked at some of the factors relevant to enforcing a domestic arbitration in New Zealand.     * This case looked at some of the factors relevant to enforcing a domestic arbitration in New Zealand.
-===== 2009 =====+==== 2009 ====
   * [[Perth Freightlines v BM2008|Perth Freightlines Pty Ltd & Ors v BM2008 Pty Ltd & Ors]] (([2009] VSC 542)), Hargrave J (upheld on appeal)   * [[Perth Freightlines v BM2008|Perth Freightlines Pty Ltd & Ors v BM2008 Pty Ltd & Ors]] (([2009] VSC 542)), Hargrave J (upheld on appeal)
     * The applicable law is not in doubt. ​     * The applicable law is not in doubt. ​
Line 103: Line 108:
       * The arbitrator found, as a matter of fact, that no basis of damage was proved, including as to the more limited amount. ​       * The arbitrator found, as a matter of fact, that no basis of damage was proved, including as to the more limited amount. ​
       * In these circumstances,​ notwithstanding my view that there were arguable (albeit technical) breaches of the warranties, leave to appeal should be refused, and the defendants should be given leave to enforce the final award.       * In these circumstances,​ notwithstanding my view that there were arguable (albeit technical) breaches of the warranties, leave to appeal should be refused, and the defendants should be given leave to enforce the final award.
-===== 2000 =====+==== 2000 ====
   * [[Gold and Resource Developments (NZ) v Doug Hood|Gold and Resource Developments (NZ) Ltd v Doug Hood Ltd]](([2000] 3 NZLR 318 (CA) ))   * [[Gold and Resource Developments (NZ) v Doug Hood|Gold and Resource Developments (NZ) Ltd v Doug Hood Ltd]](([2000] 3 NZLR 318 (CA) ))
  
-===== 1925 =====+==== 1925 ====
   * [[Kidman v Commonwealth|Kidman v Commonwealth]](([1925] HCA 55; (1925) 37 CLR 233)) Isaacs J.   * [[Kidman v Commonwealth|Kidman v Commonwealth]](([1925] HCA 55; (1925) 37 CLR 233)) Isaacs J.
      * Lord Dunedin, for the Judicial Committee, in Champsey Bhara & Co. v. Jivraj Balloo Spinning and Weaving Co.(( (1923) A.C., at p. 486.)) said:      * Lord Dunedin, for the Judicial Committee, in Champsey Bhara & Co. v. Jivraj Balloo Spinning and Weaving Co.(( (1923) A.C., at p. 486.)) said:

  © White SW Computer Law 1994-2019. ABN 94 669 684 644. All Rights Reserved.
  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
  This website is a guide only and should not be used as a substitute for proper legal advice.
  Readers should make their own enquiries and seek appropriate legal advice.
  For legal advice please email wcl@computerlaw.com.au